“茅盾文學獎”評獎的思考

關于“茅盾文學獎”評獎的思考

摘   要

茅盾文學獎的評獎標準包括文學因素和非文學因素。茅盾文學獎對中國文壇產生了積極影響，作出了重要貢獻。茅盾文學獎評獎存在著不合理的需要改進的方面包括：茅盾文學獎評獎的評委組成、評選程序、對文學精品的認識問題等。針對茅盾文學獎存在的缺陷，應對茅盾文學獎的評選作進1步的改進，以發揮茅盾文學獎對文學創作的激勵和引領作用，使茅盾文學獎的評選具有更多的公信力和更高的威望。
    關鍵詞：茅盾文學獎；評獎；思考
 

ABSTRACT
 
The appraisal standards of MaoDun Literary Prize comprises the literary and nonliterary facts. The positive effects and great contribution of MaoDun Literary Prize on Chinese literary circles are affirmed, and the point of view that MaoDun Literary Prize still needs improvement is expressed. Suggestions are for the constitute of the evaluation committee, procedure of the evaluation committee, awareness of the top quality novels. Through the above discussions on its effects and limitations, this paper intends to accelerate the leading and encouraging function of MaoDun Literary Prize on literary works, and make it more credible.
    Key words: Mao Dun literature prize; Appraisal; Ponder

 

【“茅盾文學獎”評獎的思考】相關文章：

語言文學畢業論文-關于“茅盾文學獎”評獎的思考03-04

關于國學的思考12-05

非婚同居的法律思考03-13

對舞蹈教育的多元思考03-07

關于“國學熱”的思考03-07

對培養審計人才的思考03-08

對品牌授權經營的思考03-18

極限思想的辯證思考03-07

淺談藥師立法的思考03-24