<dfn id="w48us"></dfn><ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <del id="w48us"></del>
    <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案

    時間:2024-10-09 02:02:17 ACCA 我要投稿
    • 相關推薦

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

      Question:

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

      Apt Ltd is a small independent book company, which specialises in publishing modern poetry. In January 2013 itsigned a contract with a new poet, called Bel, to publish her second book of poems in August 2014. In March 2013, Bel won a prestigious award for her first book of poems, which had been published privately.

      In the light of the fame which now attached to Bel, Apt Ltd launched an extensive advertising campaign publicising the forthcoming book. The campaign was expensive, costing £50,000, but it was successful in generating great interest. As a result, Apt Ltd won a contract to supply a large book club with 100,000 copies of the book, which would make them a profit of £250,000.

      Unfortunately in May 2014, Bel informed Apt Ltd that she would not be able to supply the manuscript to it as she had signed a more rewarding contract with Cax plc, a very large publishing company.

      Required:

      In the context of Bel’s anticipatory breach of contract, explain any possible remedies open to Apt Ltd.

      Answer:

      The essential issues to be disentangled from the problem scenario relate to breach of contract and the remedies available for such breach.

      There is clearly a binding contractual agreement between Art Ltd and Bel, which Bel has stated she intends to break. Normally breach of a contract occurs where one of the parties to the agreement fails to comply, either completely or satisfactorily, with their obligations under it. However, such a definition does not appear to apply in this case as the time has not yet come when Bel has to produce the manuscript. She has merely indicated that she has no intention of doing so. This is an example of the operation of the doctrine of anticipatory breach. This arises precisely where one party, prior to the actual due date of performance, demonstrates an intention not to perform their contractual obligations. The intention not to fulfil the contract can be either express or implied.

      Express anticipatory breach occurs where a party actually states that they will not perform their contractual obligations (Hochster v De La Tour (1853)). Implied anticipatory breach occurs where a party carries out some act which makes performance impossible (Omnium Enterprises v Sutherland (1919)).

      When anticipatory breach takes place, the innocent party can sue for damages immediately on receipt of the notification of the other party’s intention to repudiate the contract, without waiting for the actual contractual date of performance as in Hochster v De La Tour. Alternatively, they can wait until the actual time for performance before taking action. In the latter instance, they are entitled to make preparations for performance, and claim the agreed contract price (White and Carter (Councils) v McGregor (1961)).

      It would appear that Bel’s action is clearly an instance of express anticipatory breach and that Art Ltd has the right either to accept the repudiation immediately, or affirm the contract and take action against Bel at the time for performance (Vitol SA v Norelf Ltd (1996)). In any event, Bel is bound to complete her contractual promise or suffer the consequences of her breach of contract.

      Remedies for breach of contract

      (i) Specific performance

      It will sometimes suit a party to break their contractual obligations, even if they have to pay damages. In such circumstances, the court can make an order for specific performance to require the party in breach to complete their part of the contract. However, as specific performance is not available in respect of contracts of employment or personal service, Bel cannot be legally required to provide the manuscript to Apt Ltd (Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association (1893)). This means that the only remedy against Bel lies in the award of damages.

      (ii) Damages

      A breach of contract will result in the innocent party being able to sue for damages. Apt Ltd, therefore, can sue Bel for damages, but the important issue relates to the extent of such damages.

    【ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案】相關文章:

    ACCA《公司法與商法》真題及答案09-22

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》訓練試題03-19

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》練習試題03-19

    《論語》試題及答案04-19

    為什么要考ACCA?答案就這么簡單......03-20

    acca待遇如何?acca收入多少?03-20

    Indesign認證試題及答案03-17

    excel操作試題及答案03-19

    photoshop試題附答案07-15

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩精品专区AV无码| 久热这里只有精品视频6| 亚洲永久精品ww47| 中文字幕亚洲精品资源网| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片| 国产精品亚洲视频| 99久久国产热无码精品免费| 亚洲AV无码之日韩精品| 午夜精品美女写真福利| 久久精品中文闷骚内射| 亚洲国产精品丝袜在线观看| 国产欧美精品专区一区二区| 国产精品一级香蕉一区| 亚洲高清国产AV拍精品青青草原| 国产乱人伦精品一区二区在线观看 | 国产精品一久久香蕉国产线看观看 | 久久久久人妻一区精品果冻| 欧美精品一本久久男人的天堂| 国产成人A人亚洲精品无码| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人精品97 | 99riav国产精品| 国产在视频线精品视频二代| 国产精品视频一区二区噜噜| 亚洲av无码国产精品夜色午夜| 日韩欧美亚洲国产精品字幕久久久 | 国产精品自在拍一区二区不卡| 久久免费国产精品一区二区| 成人久久精品一区二区三区| 国产最新进精品视频| 久久精品国产亚洲AV电影 | 亚洲精品视频在线| 久久777国产线看观看精品| 97久久国产亚洲精品超碰热| 精品无码久久久久国产| 久久亚洲精品成人AV| 欧美精品一区二区蜜臀亚洲| 亚洲国产精品无码久久98| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码二区| 亚洲高清国产拍精品青青草原| 久久精品中文字幕一区| 精品人妻V?出轨中文字幕|