<dfn id="w48us"></dfn><ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <del id="w48us"></del>
    <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • 英語演講稿:Shall We Choose Death

    時間:2023-04-05 08:28:30 英語演講稿 我要投稿
    • 相關推薦

    英語演講稿:Shall We Choose Death

    Dear,
      I am speaking not as a Briton, not as a European, not as a member of a western democracy, but as a human being, a member of the species Man, whose continued existence is in doubt. The world is full of conflicts: Jews and Arabs; Indians and Pakistanis; white men and Negroes in Africa; and, overshadowing all minor conflicts, the titanic struggle between communism and anticommunism.
      Almost everybody who is politically conscious has strong feelings about one or more of these issues; but I want you, if you can, to set aside such feelings for the moment and consider yourself only as a member of a biological species which has had a remarkable history and whose disappearance none of us can desire. I shall try to say no single word which should appeal to one group rather than to another. All, equally, are in peril, and, if the peril is understood, there is hope that they may collectively avert it. We have to learn to think in a new way. We have to learn to ask ourselves not what steps can be taken to give military victory to whatever group we prefer, for there no longer are such steps. The question we have to ask ourselves is: What steps can be taken to prevent a military contest of which the issue must be disastrous to all sides?
      The general public, and even many men in positions of authority, have not realized what would be involved in a war with hydrogen bombs. The general public still thinks in terms of the obliteration of cities. It is understood that the new bombs are more powerful than the old and that, while one atomic bomb could obliterate Hiroshima, one hydrogen bomb could obliterate the largest cities such as London, New York, and Moscow. No doubt in a hydrogen-bomb war great cities would be obliterated. But this is one of the minor disasters that would have to be faced. If everybody in London, New York, and Moscow were exterminated, the world might, in the course of a few centuries, recover from the blow. But we now know, especially since the Bikini test, that hydrogen bombs can gradually spread destruction over a much wider area than had been supposed. It is stated on very good authority that a bomb can now be manufactured which will be 25,000 times as powerful as that which destroyed Hiroshima. Such a bomb, if exploded near the ground or under water, sends radioactive particles into the upper air. They sink gradually and reach the surface of the earth in the form of a deadly dust or rain. It was this dust which infected the Japanese fishermen and their catch of fish although they were outside what American experts believed to be the danger zone. No one knows how widely such lethal radioactive particles might be diffused, but the best authorities are unanimous in saying that a war with hydrogen bombs is quite likely to put an end to the human race. It is feared that if many hydrogen bombs are used there will be universal death - sudden only for a fortunate minority, but for the majority a slow torture of disease and disintegration...
      Here, then, is the problem which I present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race1 or shall mankind renounce war? People will not face this alternative because it is so difficult to abolish war. The abolition of war will demand distasteful limitations of national sovereignty. But what perhaps impedes understanding of the situation more than anything else is that the term 'mankind' feels vague and abstract. People scarcely realize in imagination that the danger is to themselves and their children and their grandchildren, and not only to a dimly apprehended humanity' And so they hope that perhaps war may be allowed to continue provided modern weapons are prohibited. I am afraid this hope is illusory. Whatever agreements not to use hydrogen bombs had been reached in time of peace, they would no longer be considered binding in time of war, and both sides would set to work to manufacture hydrogen bombs as soon as war broke out, for if one side manufactured the bombs and the other did not, the side that manufactured them would inevitably be victorious...
      As geological time is reckoned, Man has so far existed only for a very short period one million years at the most. What he has achieved, especially during the last 6,000 years, is something utterly new in the history of the Cosmos, so far at least as we are acquainted with it. For countless ages the sun rose and set, the moon waxed and waned, the stars shone in the night, but it was only with the coming of Man that these things were understood. In the great world of astronomy and in the little world of the atom, Man has unveiled secrets which might have been thought undiscoverable. In art and literature and religion, some men have shown a sublimity of feeling which makes the species worth preserving. Is all this to end in trivial horror because so few are able to think of Man rather than of this or that group of men? Is our race so destitute of wisdom, so incapable of impartial love, so blind even to the simplest dictates of self-preservation, that the last proof of its silly cleverness is to be the extermination of all life on our planet? - for it will be not only men who will perish, but also the animals, whom no one can accuse of communism or anticommunism.
      I cannot believe that this is to be the end. I would have men forget their quarrels for a moment and reflect that, if they will allow themselves to survive, there is every reason to expect the triumphs of the future to exceed immeasurably the triumphs of the past. There lies before us, if we choose, continual progress in happiness, knowledge, and wisdom. Shall we, instead, choose death, because we cannot forget our quarrels? I appeal, as a human being to human beings: remember your humanity, and forget the rest. If you can do so, the way lies open to a new Paradise; if you cannot, nothing lies before you but universal death.

    【英語演講稿:Shall We Choose Death】相關文章:

    約翰遜演講稿:We Shall Overcome12-13

    小學英語說課稿范文《we love animals》12-10

    PEP小學英語《We love animals》教學反思01-16

    Why Do We Say That Language英語論文03-01

    Dickinsons Because I Couldn't Stop For Death06-01

    《we love animals》小學英語優秀說課稿(通用10篇)10-28

    勵志歌曲《we are the champions》12-19

    蔡依林 《We Are One》歌詞12-29

    我們遵守的禮儀 The Manner We Follow01-16

    英文的自我鑒定:One's deceased father grind answer choose in08-18

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 九九热在线精品视频| 国产精品一区二区久久精品无码| 久久精品国产精品亚洲精品| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区狼人影院 | 国产成人AV无码精品| 精品深夜AV无码一区二区| 国产在线精品一区免费香蕉| 成人久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品尤物YW在线观看| 99久久精品免费看国产一区二区三区| 久久er99热精品一区二区| 日韩精品无码Av一区二区| 一区二区三区国产精品| 岛国精品一区免费视频在线观看 | 69久久精品无码一区二区| 亚欧乱色国产精品免费视频| 国产成人精品综合在线观看| 久久国产精品-国产精品| 久久久久成人精品无码中文字幕| 欧美日韩精品系列一区二区三区国产一区二区精品 | 久久久国产精品| 国产vA免费精品高清在线观看| 午夜精品美女写真福利| 91精品国产9l久久久久| 精品久久久噜噜噜久久久| 热re99久久精品国99热| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久自慰| 日韩欧美亚洲国产精品字幕久久久 | 国产成人精品午夜福利| 日韩精品少妇无码受不了| 亚洲精品国产va在线观看蜜芽| 久久久精品国产Sm最大网站| 久久精品成人影院| 久久久久久久久久久免费精品 | 久久精品国产亚洲综合色| 国产精品无码一区二区三级 | 亚洲精品视频在线| 久久国产免费观看精品| 久久精品国产福利国产秒| 亚洲国语精品自产拍在线观看| 色综合久久精品中文字幕首页 |